Methodology
Here's exactly how the sausage gets made. If you think I'm doing it wrong, the findings posts include enough detail to check my work.
The basic unit: one experiment
An experiment is a fixed set of questions, asked the same way, across one or more AI assistants, with every cited source written down. A question set might be "best plumber in Austin TX" style local queries or "best CRM for a small real estate team" style software queries. The questions don't change between runs. That's the whole discipline.
What I record
- The exact question, word for word
- Which assistant, and the date
- Every domain cited, in order
- Whether the sources are businesses, directories, publishers, or forums
- Whether I got an answer at all — some assistants now hide behind sign-in walls
What I test
I change one variable at a time. A page's opening paragraph. FAQ structure. Review counts. Schema markup. Brand mentions on third-party sites. Then I re-run the questions and compare citation rates. One variable. That's the rule — break it and you're just guessing.
What I don't do
- I don't scrape assistants in ways that break their terms. The scaled testing runs through official APIs.
- I don't sell placement. Findings are findings — nobody can pay to look good here.
- I don't claim permanent truths. Models change monthly. Every finding carries a test date, and I re-run the important ones.
Reproducibility
Every finding post lists its questions and test date so you can sanity-check me. If you re-run one of my experiments and get a different result, I genuinely want to know — that's how this gets better.